Decay – 100% Preventable
June 7, 2011
I spent last week in Boston for the annual meeting of an organization I belong to called the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry (AACD). It was a great meeting. In the four days I was there I took eight classes, went to a Red Sox game, did a Duck Boat tour, and had dinner in the North End. It was great to be a “tourist” in Boston. I learned more about the history of Boston and a great deal of information to be able to provide better care.
There are a wide variety of courses to take at a meeting like this. Most of them are obviously related to cosmetic-based dentistry, but there are other courses offered. Of the eight classes I took, this one particular course struck me the most. It was on current research of dental decay. I know what you are thinking, booooooring; I did too before I took the class. I learned so much and want to share some of the material I learned with you.
Dental caries (decay) is on the rise. It is the #1 disease in children; it has a genetic component and has systemic effects. There are over 19,000 different bacteria that have been found in mouths and every person has about 1,000 different types. Not all of them cause decay and many of them have also been found to grow on artery walls.
Why the increase in decay? Most of it has to do with dietary trends. If you haven’t noticed, our society is getting fat. We snack more, eat more sugar/carbs, drink more soda, have more gastric reflux, take more mouth-drying medications, etc. Dental caries is a pH specific disease. The right bacteria, plus sugar, create acid which breaks down the enamel of the teeth. Add an already acidic environment and it is even worse. It is a 100% preventable disease. The problem is that changing behavior can be very hard to do.
It is time for the dental professional to take a different approach when treating this disease. More focus needs to be shifted to prevention of decay rather just treating it. Filling teeth is treating the result of the disease but does nothing to prevent it. The dentist needs to take a more active role in assessing individual’s risk factors. In the dental world this is referred to as CAMBRA, which stands for Caries Management By Risk Assessment.
Based on assessing an individual’s risk factors such as quality of home care, quality of salivary flow, medication issues, and dietary issues, a caries-preventive strategy can be established. There are many new products on the horizon to help combat and virtually eliminate this disease. However, dentists must take some responsibility and be open to a different management of this disease. They must also be able to motivate people to change habits, which is difficult. The bottom line is that if you want to be decay-free you can be.
For those at higher risk, there are some great products currently available and others to come. Everything from new toothpastes and gels with ions in them to rebuild tooth structure, sprays to neutralize pH and probiotics are on their way. Right now you can use things like sweetener replacement Xylitol, which by itself is cavity-fighting, but also works synergistically with fluoride. Prescription level toothpastes are also available and there is strong research for the topical application of fluoride varnish, the same stuff the kids get, for adults.
The evidence is very clear – this is a 100% preventable disease. Next time you go to the dentist and find out you have a new cavity, stop blaming the dentist or yourself, and ask to get a specific protocol for prevention of this disease based on your specific risk factors.
What Fluoride is Right for You?
December 22, 2010
I received a very nice letter from Joe in Amesbury a couple of weeks ago regarding one of my columns. In addition, Joe shared some information about a fluoridation issue in Amesbury as well as what he has done to combat the problem. I would like to share some of this information as well as add some comments on community water fluoridation.
One of Joe’s concerns was Amesbury’s decision to stop fluoridating the town’s water supply due to “concern for the quality of the fluoride that was being purchased from China”. Why the fluoride was being purchased from China is a topic for a different discussion.
Because of this decision by Amesbury, Joe took the matter into his own hands. Joe says that he has been participating in the Tufts University School of Dental Medicine “geriatric” program for a while. One of the benefits of this program is a particular “kit” that is made available for purchase which includes a prescription high-fluoride toothpaste, re-mineralization paste, floss, anti-cavity mints (xylitol), and a prescription mouth rinse. I commend Joe for realizing that dental care should go beyond the basics, especially as we age.
I would bet you would think that I was a proponent of public water fluoridation given my profession. I am not. In fact, I think it is unethical, unnecessary, ineffective, unsafe, inefficient, and unscientifically promoted. Although there is not enough space in this column to go into this in depth, let me give you an example of each.
Public water fluoridation is unethical because it violates an individual’s right to informed consent to mass medication. It is okay to put substances in the public water to make it safe, but not to medicate, and especially not a heavy metal that accumulates in the body. Public water fluoridation is also unnecessary because people, including children, can have healthy teeth without being exposed to systemic fluoride. This is different than topical fluoride which I will explain at the end of this column.
Public water fluoridation is ineffective as research has shown that fluoride’s benefits are primarily topical and not systemic. Countries that have halted water fluoridation generally do not see increases in decay. It is unsafe as systemic fluoride accumulates in the pineal gland and in bones, making them more brittle. Also, where the fluoride comes from is an interesting topic of discussion.
Public water fluoridation is inefficient for many reasons, one being that more and more people drink bottled water (which is loosely regulated) and most of the public water ends up washing dishes, in the shower or watering the lawn. If ingestion of fluoride did make sense there are better ways to make it available to people who want it.
Lastly, public water fluoridation is unscientifically promoted. As stated by the US Centers for Disease Control, “Laboratory and epidemiologic research suggests that fluoride prevents dental caries predominately after eruption of the tooth into the mouth, and its actions primarily are topical for both adults and children”. I am a big proponent of topical fluoride such as the fluoride found in toothpaste. And, as we age, the decay rate often increases which is a great reason to be on a prescription level toothpaste.
You’re doing just the right thing, Joe.